Is discussion of WikiLeaks censored by Twitter?
Here's an interesting development in the 'internet and free speech' debate. Twitter is apparently censoring discussion of the WikiLeaks release by not showing #wikileaks, #cablegate or #assange as trending topics. Tech tweeter Dave Winer noticed this earlier this morning and this well-researched blog post has also suggested censorship on the part of Twitter, demonstrating the evidence with a graph of 'true' trending phrases.
It will be fascinating to see if there is any truth behind the suggestion of wilfull censorship. Twitter seem to be denying it so far (see also; Mashable), but it seems likely that another bit of murky water is about to flow into the torrent of WikiLeaks news stories, especially now that Assange has been arrested.
If Twitter is censoring trending topics, or has done in the past - on any subject - then that is a major infringement on what Twitter claims to be. That is, a platform for free speech and discussion. Clandestine censoring is even worse, but of course any public announcement of this as 'official policy' would hardly have been taken well by Twitter users.
It would also be interesting to know who specifically took the decision to censor, and where pressure to do so originated, should the allegations prove true.
However, one additional point to consider, in support of Twitter's statement that their algorithm has remained true in accurately showing tweet diversity and volume in the trending list, it is possible that those who have commented on this 'apparent censorship' feel the way they do because of a skewed sense of perspective. Not everyone is talking about WikiLeaks, after all, but social media and journalism buffs have been obsessing about it for two weeks now. Interestingly, 'Assange Arrested' - which refers more generally to a news story - has entered the trending topics today.
Without clear evidence to suggest such skewed perspectives, however, (for which we currently have to trust in algorithms and the motives of those who deploy them...) there is no empirical way to know for sure.
- Terrified Together: The Online Cult of Slender Man
- How We Started Calling Visual Metaphors “Skeuomorphs” and Why the Debate over Apple’s Interface Design is a Mess
- "The Wheel of the Devil": On Vine, gifs and the power of the loop
- Facebook, the Projected Self and Narcissism
- Self-Sacrifice in the Age of the Gadget
- The Quality of Offline and Online Friendships
- Lucidending: Empathy, Online
- "a modern version of Dante's circles of hell"
3 hours ago.
- A thousand times yes. Retired IT manager catalogues ridiculous automated telephone call menu sequences: http://t.co/vlPdHrvGYB
3 hours ago.
- RT @iRowan: Not heard of Shinichi Mochizuki? He may be the mysterious creator of Bitcoin. (Then again, he may not be...) http://t.co/X9lu0d
8 hours ago.
Interfaces express not that a journey has been eliminated, but that a new one may be created.
Networking, in many senses, gives rise to a new perspective on the London Riots of 2011.
Does abstinence from the web ever last? Is it even a good idea?
Computer viruses are not just computer viruses. They spread in pathological as well as technological ways.